← Capabilities
Critical Technology

Resilient & Infrastructure-Independent Networks

The capacity to communicate when infrastructure fails or is denied: mesh and self-organising networks, undersea and hostile-environment communication, and links that need no fixed network. One of the capabilities of Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies.

International families
8,4682015 to 2024
Leading country
United States1.5× the next
All families
28khome filings included
Over five years
Falling2020 to 2024 against the five before

Year by year

Patent families by country of origin and the year of the earliest filing, 2000 to 2025; 2025 is a part year, still filling in. International families are those for which protection was sought beyond one country.

Volume

International patent families in the capability, by the year of the earliest filing.

Source: Global Institute for National Capability (GINC), 2026. Underlying patents from 107 patent offices, IFI CLAIMS and Google

Share by country

Each country's share of the year's international families, in per cent: the capability's five largest countries of origin, 2015 to 2024, and the rest of the world.

Source: Global Institute for National Capability (GINC), 2026. Underlying patents from 107 patent offices, IFI CLAIMS and Google

Country leaderboard

International patent families, 2015 to 2024, by country of origin. Growth compares the latest five full years with the five before.

Ten largest

United States

China

Japan

South Korea

Germany

Sweden

Taiwan

France

Finland

Netherlands

2,275

1,526

1,353

852

397

245

237

222

187

175

2000 to 2025
1United States2,27526.9%0.6×
4,174
2China1,52618.0%1.2×
16,274
3Japan1,35316.0%0.5×
2,305
4South Korea85210.1%0.6×
2,107
5Germany3974.7%0.6×
508
6Sweden2452.9%0.4×
250
7Taiwan2372.8%0.6×
295
8France2222.6%0.6×
271
9Finland1872.2%0.8×
199
10Netherlands1752.1%0.7×
187
11United Kingdom1672.0%0.2×
225
12Canada1421.7%0.3×
181
13Switzerland871.0%0.9×
102
14Singapore831.0%0.8×
112
15Australia620.7%1.1×
89
16Israel490.6%0.7×
72
17India440.5%0.8×
172
18Norway360.4%0.9×
40
19Italy350.4%1.1×
55
20Türkiye350.4%1.9×
47
21Denmark210.2%0.6×
24
22Belgium210.2%0.6×
22
23Ireland210.2%0.6×
29
24Spain200.2%0.3×
37
25Hong Kong170.2%0.2×
21
26Cayman Islands170.2%0.1×
18
27Saudi Arabia160.2%0.5×
43
28Austria150.2%0.7×
18
29Poland120.1%1.0×
19
30Brazil110.1%0.4×
23
31Russia90.1%0.5×
61
32Mexico70.1%0.4×
10
33Portugal70.1%0.4×
9
34New Zealand60.1%0.5×
6
35Malaysia40.0%1.0×
8
36South Africa30.0%0.0×
4
37Luxembourg30.0%2.0×
3
38Czechia20.0%–
3
39Liechtenstein10.0%0.0×
1
40Hungary10.0%0.0×
1

Applicants

The largest applicants by international patent families, 2015 to 2024: across the world, then within each of the five countries with the most families in Resilient & Infrastructure-Independent Networks. Names are as held in the source and are not consolidated across subsidiaries.

Global

8,468 international families

HUAWEI TECH CO LTD · China

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD · South Korea

QUALCOMM INC · United States

ERICSSON TELEFON AB L M · Sweden

LG ELECTRONICS INC · South Korea

CANON KK · Japan

376

365

285

184

178

141

United States

2,275 international families

QUALCOMM INC

INTEL CORP

GOOGLE LLC

APPLE INC

HONEYWELL INT INC

INTEL IP CORP

271

85

77

69

48

45

China

1,526 international families

HUAWEI TECH CO LTD

VIVO MOBILE COMMUNICATION CO LTD

ZTE CORP

GUANGDONG OPPO MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP LTD

BEIJING XIAOMI MOBILE SOFTWARE CO LTD

OPPO GUANGDONG MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO LTD

367

103

79

77

59

48

Japan

1,353 international families

CANON KK

MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP

NEC CORP

SONY CORP

TOSHIBA KK

FUJITSU LTD

141

103

80

80

78

74

South Korea

852 international families

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD

LG ELECTRONICS INC

HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD

KIA MOTORS CORP

ELECTRONICS & TELECOMMUNICATIONS RES INST

KIA CORP

365

178

46

32

26

13

Germany

397 international families

BOSCH GMBH ROBERT

SIEMENS AG

VOLKSWAGEN AG

FRAUNHOFER GES FORSCHUNG

DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG

CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE TECH GMBH

47

26

23

17

16

14

Similar capabilities

The nine capabilities that share the most international patent families with Resilient & Infrastructure-Independent Networks, 2015 to 2024: the families counted in both as a share of those counted in either. Each card shows its five largest countries.

Strategic Infrastructure

Mobile & Wireless Networks

3.0% shared · 7,770 families in both

China

United States

Japan

South Korea

Sweden

83,485

59,761

31,601

30,496

14,008

Critical Technology

Advanced Wireless Communication

2.8% shared · 7,144 families in both

China

United States

Japan

South Korea

Sweden

82,694

57,368

31,448

30,111

13,628

Strategic Infrastructure

Core & Backbone Networks

2.1% shared · 2,284 families in both

United States

China

Japan

South Korea

Germany

26,336

26,166

15,255

6,683

4,804

Critical Technology

Protective Cybersecurity Technologies

1.3% shared · 1,116 families in both

United States

China

Japan

South Korea

Germany

24,476

15,698

8,691

6,051

4,461

Governance & Integrity

National Risk Assessment & Early Warning

1.3% shared · 200 families in both

United States

Japan

South Korea

China

Germany

2,018

1,258

1,068

1,030

432

Critical Technology

Privacy, Identity & Trust Technologies

1.1% shared · 884 families in both

United States

China

Japan

South Korea

Germany

20,167

13,819

8,702

6,734

3,966

Strategic Infrastructure

Spectrum & Broadcasting

1.1% shared · 209 families in both

United States

Japan

China

South Korea

Sweden

3,343

2,083

1,912

1,251

572

Critical Technology

Acoustic & Undersea Sensing

1.0% shared · 183 families in both

United States

Japan

Germany

China

South Korea

2,064

1,735

1,370

1,097

687

Strategic Infrastructure

Emergency Services & Civil Protection

1.0% shared · 249 families in both

United States

Japan

South Korea

China

Germany

4,379

2,906

2,123

1,861

1,333

Crosswalk

How Resilient & Infrastructure-Independent Networks is matched to the patent classifications. The entries below were chosen for it; each stands for itself and everything beneath it in the scheme, 6 Cooperative entries in all. A patent family counts when any of its codes, in either scheme and at any office, falls under one of them. Codes since retired are placed under the entries that replaced them.

EntryTitle in the schemeWhy it is chosenCPC codesIPC codesDocuments
H04W84/18Self-organising networks, e.g. ad-hoc networks or sensor networksSelf-organising, ad-hoc, mesh and sensor networks33133,285
H04B13/02Transmission systems in which the medium consists of the earth or a large mass of water thereon, e.g. earth telegraphyCommunication through the earth or through water117,835
H04B11/00Transmission systems employing ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic wavesAcoustic communication, including underwater1111,056
H04B7/22Scatter propagation systems, e.g. ionospheric, tropospheric or meteor scatterScatter-propagation radio links112,092

CPC and IPC codes are the codes in use on patent documents, at any office, that fall under the entry. Documents is the larger of the two schemes' counts of documents carrying one of them. An entry with no IPC codes can be told apart only in the Cooperative scheme.

The Cooperative codes in use that count towards Resilient & Infrastructure-Independent Networks: 6 codes on 153,561 documents. The full crosswalk is in the cpc-to-capability.csv download.

CodeTitleUnder entryHow placedDocuments
H04W84/18Self-organising networks, e.g. ad-hoc networks or sensor networksH04W84/18In the scheme113,884
H04W84/20Leader-follower arrangementsH04W84/18In the scheme14,367
H04B11/00Transmission systems employing ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic wavesH04B11/00In the scheme10,587
H04B13/02Transmission systems in which the medium consists of the earth or a large mass of water thereon, e.g. earth telegraphyH04B13/02In the scheme7,634
H04W84/22Self-organising networks, e.g. ad-hoc networks or sensor networks with access to wired networksH04W84/18In the scheme5,034
H04B7/22Scatter propagation systems, e.g. ionospheric, tropospheric or meteor scatterH04B7/22In the scheme2,055
Match: Direct
The capability is itself a technology or a kind of physical system, and the classification names it. Tactical and undersea-cable communication have no entries of their own, so this is a narrow proxy. The crosswalk is a first pass that nobody has reviewed.

Other capabilities in Connectivity, Cyber & Trust Technologies