← Capabilities
Critical Technology

Post-Quantum Cryptography

The capacity to develop, standardise and migrate to cryptography that withstands quantum attack, the algorithms, the implementations and the national transition of systems that must stay secret for decades. One of the capabilities of Quantum Technologies.

International families
4322015 to 2024
Leading country
South Korea1.1× the next
All families
729home filings included
Over five years
Rising2020 to 2024 against the five before

Year by year

Patent families by country of origin and the year of the earliest filing, 2000 to 2025; 2025 is a part year, still filling in. International families are those for which protection was sought beyond one country.

Volume

International patent families in the capability, by the year of the earliest filing.

Source: Global Institute for National Capability (GINC), 2026. Underlying patents from 107 patent offices, IFI CLAIMS and Google

Share by country

Each country's share of the year's international families, in per cent: the capability's five largest countries of origin, 2015 to 2024, and the rest of the world.

Source: Global Institute for National Capability (GINC), 2026. Underlying patents from 107 patent offices, IFI CLAIMS and Google

Country leaderboard

International patent families, 2015 to 2024, by country of origin. Growth compares the latest five full years with the five before.

Ten largest

South Korea

United States

France

Japan

Germany

Netherlands

China

United Kingdom

Switzerland

Taiwan

98

86

52

46

30

26

22

13

11

6

2000 to 2025
1South Korea9822.7%3.3×
165
2United States8619.9%2.3×
186
3France5212.0%4.8×
54
4Japan4610.6%1.1×
47
5Germany306.9%2.3×
36
6Netherlands266.0%1.2×
35
7China225.1%1.4×
105
8United Kingdom133.0%2.3×
17
9Switzerland112.5%4.5×
11
10Taiwan61.4%5.0×
7
11Canada61.4%2.0×
23
12Australia40.9%1.0×
4
13Spain40.9%–
4
14Israel30.7%–
4
15Belgium30.7%–
3
16Singapore30.7%0.5×
3
17Ireland30.7%–
3
18Hungary30.7%2.0×
5
19Sweden20.5%0.0×
2
20Finland20.5%1.0×
2
21Türkiye20.5%–
2
22Austria10.2%–
1
23India10.2%–
2
24Cayman Islands10.2%–
1
25Liechtenstein10.2%–
1
26Russia00.0%–
2

Applicants

The largest applicants by international patent families, 2015 to 2024: across the world, then within each of the five countries with the most families in Post-Quantum Cryptography. Names are as held in the source and are not consolidated across subsidiaries.

Global

432 international families

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD · South Korea

CRYPTO LAB INC · South Korea

SEOUL NAT UNIV R&DB FOUNDATION · South Korea

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG · Germany

ZAMA SAS · France

KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV · Netherlands

29

28

18

16

14

13

South Korea

98 international families

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD

CRYPTO LAB INC

SEOUL NAT UNIV R&DB FOUNDATION

UNIV CHOSUN IACF

ELECTRONICS & TELECOMMUNICATIONS RES INST

SAMSUNG SDS CO LTD

29

28

18

8

6

6

United States

86 international families

INTEL CORP

IBM

MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC

NTT RESEARCH INC

PQSECURE TECH LLC

VISA INT SERVICE ASS

12

9

9

6

6

4

France

52 international families

ZAMA SAS

THALES DIS FRANCE SAS

ZAMA SIMPLE CO LTD

COMMISSARIAT ENERGIE ATOMIQUE

THALES SA

IDEMIA IDENTITY & SECURITY FRANCE

14

10

6

4

4

3

Japan

46 international families

AXELL CORP

NEC CORP

MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP

NIPPON TELEGRAPH & TELEPHONE

FUJITSU LTD

TOSHIBA KK

12

10

6

6

5

5

Germany

30 international families

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG

SIEMENS AG

BOSCH GMBH ROBERT

BECKER DANIELA

CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE TECH GMBH

ELEKTROBIT AUTOMOTIVE GMBH

16

7

2

1

1

1

Similar capabilities

The nine capabilities that share the most international patent families with Post-Quantum Cryptography, 2015 to 2024: the families counted in both as a share of those counted in either. Each card shows its five largest countries.

Critical Technology

Quantum Communication

2.4% shared · 54 families in both

United States

China

Japan

South Korea

Germany

416

252

215

195

177

Critical Technology

Privacy, Identity & Trust Technologies

0.6% shared · 432 families in both

United States

China

Japan

South Korea

Germany

20,167

13,819

8,702

6,734

3,966

National Security

Command, Control & Communications

0.3% shared · 3 families in both

United States

China

Japan

South Korea

Germany

220

57

55

51

26

Critical Technology

Quantum Computing

0.3% shared · 16 families in both

United States

Japan

China

Germany

France

2,335

791

484

336

322

Critical Technology

Protective Cybersecurity Technologies

0.2% shared · 159 families in both

United States

China

Japan

South Korea

Germany

24,476

15,698

8,691

6,051

4,461

Financial Strength

Currency Issuance & Digital Money

0.1% shared · 25 families in both

United States

Japan

China

South Korea

Germany

4,952

2,438

1,902

1,526

1,399

Governance & Integrity

Electoral Management & Integrity

0.1% shared · 1 families in both

United States

China

South Korea

Japan

France

121

80

56

21

21

National Security

Defensive Cyber Operations

0.1% shared · 18 families in both

United States

China

Japan

South Korea

Germany

5,863

1,954

1,881

1,128

878

National Security

Signals & Cyber Intelligence

0.1% shared · 2 families in both

United States

Japan

China

South Korea

Sweden

635

301

286

241

169

Crosswalk

How Post-Quantum Cryptography is matched to the patent classifications. The entries below were chosen for it; each stands for itself and everything beneath it in the scheme, 2 Cooperative entries in all. A patent family counts when any of its codes, in either scheme and at any office, falls under one of them. Codes since retired are placed under the entries that replaced them.

EntryTitle in the schemeWhy it is chosenCPC codesIPC codesDocuments
H04L9/3093Public key, i.e. encryption algorithm being computationally infeasible to invert or user's encryption keys not requiring secrecy involving Lattices or polynomial equations, e.g. NTRU schemeLattice-based public-key cryptography1none3,864
H04L9/304Public key, i.e. encryption algorithm being computationally infeasible to invert or user's encryption keys not requiring secrecy based on error correction codes, e.g. McElieceCode-based public-key cryptography, e.g. McEliece1none1,794

CPC and IPC codes are the codes in use on patent documents, at any office, that fall under the entry. Documents is the larger of the two schemes' counts of documents carrying one of them. An entry with no IPC codes can be told apart only in the Cooperative scheme.

The Cooperative codes in use that count towards Post-Quantum Cryptography: 2 codes on 5,658 documents. The full crosswalk is in the cpc-to-capability.csv download.

CodeTitleUnder entryHow placedDocuments
H04L9/3093Public key, i.e. encryption algorithm being computationally infeasible to invert or user's encryption keys not requiring secrecy involving Lattices or polynomial equations, e.g. NTRU schemeH04L9/3093In the scheme3,864
H04L9/304Public key, i.e. encryption algorithm being computationally infeasible to invert or user's encryption keys not requiring secrecy based on error correction codes, e.g. McElieceH04L9/304In the scheme1,794
Match: Direct
The capability is itself a technology or a kind of physical system, and the classification names it. Only separable in CPC; in IPC these sit inside H04L9/30 with all public-key cryptography, and hash-based signatures have no entry. The entries can be told apart only in the Cooperative scheme, so patents that carry only International codes are missed. The crosswalk is a first pass that nobody has reviewed.

Other capabilities in Quantum Technologies